Welcome to the insight hub for we can move,

This is our storage space for research, reports, opinion and news for physical activity and the wider system which we've come across.

You can search articles by theme/tag by clicking here

Log in for free to comment on the posts or join in the conversations in the forum...

Source: https://blogs.napier.ac.uk/tri/projects/

10th July 2020

School Streets Closure Traffic Displacement Literature Review FINAL.pdf

This report sets out the findings of a review of the existing literature on the impact of school street closures designed to create safer spaces for walking, cycling or street play. The evidence from the literature was supplemented by a number of semi-structured telephone interviews with relevant officers responsible for local authority school street closure schemes.

The review focuses in particular on whether any traffic displacement brought about by schemes was associated with negative safety issues in surrounding streets.

The main findings are:

On the nature, scale and coverage of the evidence
 We located 16 studies, all of which had not been peer reviewed although one was a Masters dissertation
 The locations covered by the studies included Camden, Edinburgh, Solihull, Perth and Kinross, East Lothian, Croydon, Southampton, and the region of Flanders, Belgium.

On the motivators of the street closure schemes there is
 Strong evidence that reported road casualties were not a motivator of the closure schemes
 Strong evidence that local perceptions of danger and safety risk were the key motivators
 Strong evidence that the key purpose or one of the key purposes of the schemes was to increase the number of children travelling actively to school.

On the impact of the schemes on active travel and vehicles levels and on local support there is
 Medium strength evidence that in almost all cases the total number of motor vehicles across school closures and neighbouring streets reduces
 Medium strength evidence that active travel levels increased at the schools with street closures
 Medium strength evidence that closures are supported by the majority of parents and residents living on the closed and neighbouring streets and that their support increases after any trial period.

On the impact on neighbouring streets
 Strong and consistent evidence that traffic displacement does not cause road safety issues of any significance and that mitigating measures, where needed, have been applied successfully
 Medium strength evidence that perceived road safety on surrounding streets as well as the closure streets improves as active travel increases

 Medium strength evidence that alternative parking schemes such as “Park and Stride” help reduce traffic displacement although a small number of badly parked vehicles can remain an issue.



Votes: 0
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of 'We can move' insight to add comments!

Join 'We can move' insight